From: Junio C Hamano Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2026 00:22:13 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] name-rev: learn --format= Message-ID: In-Reply-To: kristofferhaugsbakk@fastmail.com writes: > diff --git a/Documentation/git-name-rev.adoc b/Documentation/git-name-rev.adoc > index d4f1c4d5945..8f050cd4763 100644 > --- a/Documentation/git-name-rev.adoc > +++ b/Documentation/git-name-rev.adoc > @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ git-name-rev - Find symbolic names for given revs > SYNOPSIS > -------- > [verse] > -'git name-rev' [--tags] [--refs=] > +'git name-rev' [--tags] [--refs=] [--format=] > ( --all | --annotate-stdin | ... ) We acquired a new option. Do we need a matching change to the contents of name_rev_usage[] array? > +--format=:: > +--no-format:: > + Format revisions instead of outputting symbolic names. The > + default is `--no-format`. > ++ > +Implies `--name-only`. If it is implication, would git name-rev --format=reference --no-name-only do what is naturally expected? > @@ -462,6 +472,25 @@ static const char *get_rev_name(const struct object *o, struct strbuf *buf) > if (o->type != OBJ_COMMIT) > return get_exact_ref_match(o); > c = (const struct commit *) o; > + > + if (format_ctx) { > + strbuf_reset(buf); > + > + if (format_ctx->want.notes) { > + struct strbuf notebuf = STRBUF_INIT; > + > + format_display_notes(&c->object.oid, ¬ebuf, > + get_log_output_encoding(), > + format_ctx->ctx.fmt == CMIT_FMT_USERFORMAT); > + format_ctx->ctx.notes_message = strbuf_detach(¬ebuf, NULL); > + } > + > + pretty_print_commit(&format_ctx->ctx, c, buf); > + free(format_ctx->ctx.notes_message); Is free() the expected thing to do here, or FREE_AND_NULL()? Unlike callers like log-tree.c:show_log() where a context is prepared, used once, and then discarded, format_pp is initialized in cmd_name_rev() once and then repeatedly used by show_name() potentially multiple times, so there may be a risk of getting confused by this leftover non-NULL pointer that points at an already free'd piece of memory. Or there may not be---I did not check, but you as the author must have already checked, hence this question. > + return buf->buf; > + } > + > n = get_commit_rev_name(c); > if (!n) > return NULL; > @@ -479,6 +508,7 @@ static const char *get_rev_name(const struct object *o, struct strbuf *buf) > > static void show_name(const struct object *obj, > const char *caller_name, > + struct pretty_format *format_ctx, > int always, int allow_undefined, int name_only) > { > const char *name; > @@ -487,7 +517,7 @@ static void show_name(const struct object *obj, > > if (!name_only) > printf("%s ", caller_name ? caller_name : oid_to_hex(oid)); > - name = get_rev_name(obj, &buf); > + name = get_rev_name(obj, format_ctx, &buf); > if (name) > printf("%s\n", name); > else if (allow_undefined) > @@ -507,7 +537,9 @@ static char const * const name_rev_usage[] = { > NULL > }; > > -static void name_rev_line(char *p, struct name_ref_data *data) > +static void name_rev_line(char *p, > + struct name_ref_data *data, > + struct pretty_format *format_ctx) > { > struct strbuf buf = STRBUF_INIT; > int counter = 0; > @@ -532,7 +564,7 @@ static void name_rev_line(char *p, struct name_ref_data *data) > struct object *o = > lookup_object(the_repository, &oid); > if (o) > - name = get_rev_name(o, &buf); > + name = get_rev_name(o, format_ctx, &buf); > } > *(p+1) = c; > > @@ -567,6 +599,10 @@ int cmd_name_rev(int argc, > #endif > int all = 0, annotate_stdin = 0, allow_undefined = 1, always = 0, peel_tag = 0; > struct name_ref_data data = { 0, 0, STRING_LIST_INIT_NODUP, STRING_LIST_INIT_NODUP }; > + const char *format = NULL; > + struct rev_info format_rev = REV_INFO_INIT; > + struct pretty_format *format_ctx = NULL; > + struct pretty_format format_pp = {0}; Hmph, would we want to use the full init_revisions() instead of static REV_INFO_INIT that initialises a lot more members of the struct properly, most importantly the "repo" member that points at the repostiory to be used? > + if (format) { > + struct pretty_print_context ctx = {0}; > + struct userformat_want want = {0}; > + > + get_commit_format(format, &format_rev); > + ctx.rev = &format_rev; > + ctx.fmt = format_rev.commit_format; > + ctx.abbrev = format_rev.abbrev; > + ctx.date_mode_explicit = format_rev.date_mode_explicit; > + ctx.date_mode = format_rev.date_mode; > + ctx.color = GIT_COLOR_AUTO; > + format_pp.ctx = ctx; Why does this code initialize and assign to a on-stack ctx first and then assign it to format_pp.ctx, instead of working on format_pp.ctx directly? > + userformat_find_requirements(format, &want); > + if (want.notes) > + load_display_notes(NULL); > + > + format_pp.want = want; > + format_ctx = &format_pp; > + > + data.name_only = true; > + } > +