From: Junio C Hamano Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2015 19:02:19 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] support for --no-relative and diff.relative Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Junio C Hamano writes: > Patch 2/2 also seems to share similar line-wrapping breakages that > make it unappliable, but more importantly, the configuration that is > supposed to correspond to --relative option only parses a boolean. > Is that the right design, or should it also be able to substitute a > command line `--relative=` with an argument? > > The last was a half-way rhetorical question and my answer is that > boolean-only is the best you could do... > ... > [Footnote] > > *1* Actually, you could declare that "diff.relative=true/" means the > 'true/' directory while "diff.relative=true" means the boolean > 'true' aka 'diff --relative', but I think it is too confusing. > Let's not make it worse by going that route. Addendum. It was only a "half-way rhetorical question", because I am willing to be persuaded that diff.relative=true/ vs diff.relative=true is *not* too subtle/confusing to be a good idea, if enough people whose judgement I trust agrees.