From: Junio C Hamano Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 05:21:32 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: clarify "explicitly given" in push.default Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20200129024124.GC596379@coredump.intra.peff.net> Jeff King writes: > Though I'd still slightly worry that somebody might not consider > configured refspecs. Saying more clearly "any refspec no matter where it > comes from" might still be worthwhile. I.e., something like: > > Defines the action `git push` should take if no refspec is given > (whether from the command-line, config, or elsewhere). That's 100x better than to say "explicit" "implicit" etc. and then have readers guess what the adjectives mean or explain what they mean in (parentheses).