From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2024 17:50:43 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] builtin/clone.c: recognize fetch.serverOption configuration
Message-ID: <xmqq7cbq2dn0.fsf@gitster.g>
In-Reply-To: <Ztm1w_61vjEkiC4C@pks.im>

Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> writes:

> I also have to agree that "push.pushOption" would be way more sensible
> if it was configured per remote. I think it would be sensible to also
> introduce "remote.*.pushOption" in the same way and have it override the
> default value of "push.pushOption" if present. So the precedence order
> would become (from high to low):
>
>   - remote.someRemote.pushOption
>   - remote."*".pushOption
>   - push.PushOption
>
> This should be backwards compatible, too.

;-)  Sounds sensible.