From: Junio C Hamano Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2025 16:01:45 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/11] Introduce git-history(1) command for easy history editing Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <3fb47b15-ed43-4137-95f8-cee97ab5e44c@gmail.com> Phillip Wood writes: >> Granted, I think good progress is being made and perhaps the changes >> needed for the rest aren't that huge (and maybe there's more pieces >> I'm not quite understanding yet similar to the >> two-split-patches-always-summing-to-the-original), I was just a little >> surprised that my comments are summarized by "expecting a small and >> final reroll". :-) It was because I didn't think (and I still do not think) your comments are something for the immediate future, for a tool that wants to present its minimum-serviceable experimental version to users so that the users can experiment, extend it more and fix its behaviour incrementally. I may have been probably wrong, but I was getting an impression from the reviews that it is getting to there, not the feature-perfect version that needs only maintenance from now on, but a minimum-serviceable one. We could instead of collect all the I want moon and I want cheeze comments and iterate until the tool has all of them before it hits 'next', but I do not think it is often what we do to a new feature. > Yes I'm not expecting any new functionality but I am expecting a bit > more than tiny cleanup. OK. Then we'd need a non-trivial amount of work before we get there. Thanks.