From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 21:22:16 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] travis-ci: enable sequential test execution for t9113 and 9126
Message-ID: <xmqq60u48o6v.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
In-Reply-To: <7A9DE9C1-4AC7-4FF3-B8B1-26DE84BA625B@gmail.com>

Lars Schneider <larsxschneider@gmail.com> writes:

>> On 19 May 2016, at 19:11, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Eric Wong <e@80x24.org> writes:
>> 
>>> Anyways, how about making the tests run on separate ports and
>>> not worry about serializing them at all?
>> 
>> Yeah, that does sound like a more sensible approach.
>
> Makes sense. However, it's not something I will tackle soon.
> Would you be willing to pick up $gmane/295048 (the first patch) as is 
> and drop $gmane/295050 (the patch discussed here)? Then the majority
> of Git SVN tests would run on Travis CI.

I am not sure if adding git-svn alone would be a good change.
Wouldn't it invite false failures from running these conflicting
tests at the same time?