From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 17:21:24 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 06/13] pkt-line: add functions to read/write flush terminated packet streams
Message-ID: <xmqq60qnigyz.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
In-Reply-To: <D8C981C6-22F5-4922-BBF7-F71961B3271B@gmail.com>

Lars Schneider <larsxschneider@gmail.com> writes:

> OK, what function names would be more clear from your point of view?
>
> write_packetized_stream_from_fd()
> write_packetized_stream_from_buf()
> read_packetized_stream_to_buf()

Would

    write_packetized_from_fd()
    write_packetized_from_buf()
    read_packetized_to_buf()

be shorter, still understandable, be consistent with the existing
convention to name write_/read_ a function that shuffles bytes via a
file descriptor, and to the point, perhaps?