From: Junio C Hamano Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 22:25:48 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] test-lib: check for TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <6447b11b-f916-4079-8936-8d4f6c480f57@gmail.com> Rubén Justo writes: > In a recent commit we fixed a test where it was set after sourcing > test-lib.sh, leading to confusing results. OK, the reference is to the previous step. Makes sense. > > To prevent future oversights, let's add a simple check to ensure the > value for TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK remains unchanged at test_done(). > > Signed-off-by: Rubén Justo > --- > t/test-lib.sh | 5 +++++ > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/t/test-lib.sh b/t/test-lib.sh > index fc93aa57e6..042f557a6f 100644 > --- a/t/test-lib.sh > +++ b/t/test-lib.sh > @@ -1297,6 +1297,11 @@ test_done () { > EOF > fi > > + if test -z "$passes_sanitize_leak" && test_bool_env TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK false > + then > + BAIL_OUT "Please, set TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK before sourcing test-lib.sh" > + fi > + > if test "$test_fixed" != 0 > then > say_color error "# $test_fixed known breakage(s) vanished; please update test(s)"