From: Junio C Hamano Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 00:10:41 GMT Subject: Re: git gc --aggressive led to about 40 times slower "git log --raw" Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Duy Nguyen writes: > Lower depth than default (50) does not sound "aggressive" to me, at > least from disk space utilization. I agree it should be configurable > though. Do you mean you want to keep "--aggressive" to mean "too aggressive in resulting size, to the point that it is not useful to anybody"? Shallow and wide will give us, with a large window, the most aggressively efficient packfiles that are useful, and we would rather want to fix it to be usable, I would think.