From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2014 18:56:04 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/18] fsck: support demoting errors to warnings
Message-ID: <xmqq4msm2o1n.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.00.1412231911470.21312@s15462909.onlinehome-server.info>

Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:

> Hi Junio,
>
> On Tue, 23 Dec 2014, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> Having said that, I think "missingTags" etc. should not be configuration
>> variable names (instead, they should be values).
>> 
>> Because of that, I do not think we need consistency between the way
>> these "tokens that denote kinds of errors fsck denotes" are spelled and
>> the way "configuration variable names" are spelled.
>
> Okay. That makes more sense.

I am sorry that I didn't step back and think about it earlier to
notice that we shouldn't be talking about configuration variable
name syntax.  I could have saved us time going back and forth if
I did so earlier.