From: Junio C Hamano Date: Thu, 07 May 2015 15:56:39 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/12] t5520: implement tests for no merge candidates cases Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Paul Tan writes: > Hi Junio, > > On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 10:04 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> Torsten Bögershausen writes: >> >>> In other words: >>> test $(cat file) = file && >> >> Is there a guarantee that file has a single word? Can it be empty? >> Can it contain "foo bar\n"? > > It can, but it should not ;-). But yes, this will need to be quoted as > well to be safe. Whoops. Yup. I see that existing test (this script is ancient, isn't it?) has the same issue of using backticks and not quoting sufficiently. Perhaps we would want a clean-up-and-modernise step before this patch to reduce patch noise. Thanks.