From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2016 21:39:03 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCHv9 0/6] Expose submodule parallelism to the user
Message-ID: <xmqq4mdh36o8.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
In-Reply-To: <1455051274-15256-1-git-send-email-sbeller@google.com>

Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> writes:

> This replaces sb/submodule-parallel-update.
> (which is based on sb/submodule-parallel-fetch)
>
> Thanks to Junio and Jonathan for review!
>
> * s/config_parallel_submodules/parallel_submodules/ as it is not in config any
>   more. Also ease up the default setting. 
>
> * use an enum for submodule update strategy

Your earlier sb/submodule-init will need to be rerolled on top, as
it depends on ->update being a string, I think.

> * This seems to clash with 00/20] refs backend.
>> Applied this on top of a merge between the current 'master' and
>> 'sb/submodule-parallel-update' topic to untangle the dependency;
>> otherwise there is no way for this topic to make progress X-<.
>
> Anything I can do to help with easing the clash?

Perhaps try to rebase the series on top of such a merge (with this
updated series) yourself and propose it as a basis for the next
reroll for David?  In short, working together with topic(s) that
touch the same area?

Thanks.