From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Mon, 30 May 2016 22:07:21 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: GPG capitalization
Message-ID: <xmqq4m9f8ajq.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKp3HaMvsJ58fvtC+rp13wigw75vVm3F7T2U+Gqnyqke71279Q@mail.gmail.com>

David Nicolson <david.nicolson@gmail.com> writes:

>>>  message part may contain a signature that Git itself doesn't
>>> -care about, but that can be verified with gpg.
>>> +care about, but that can be verified with GPG.
>>
>> Isn't this a name of the program, though?  Other two hunks in your
>> patch clearly refer to the concept and not to a particular program,
>> and they are good changes, I think.
>
> This one was not as clear as the other hunks. Git is referred to as
> "Git" in the preceding line, which in itself could be referring to the
> concept or the particular program I guess?

I think the "Git" you see above is clearly the "stupid content
tracker Git", not a particular implementation.  It is more about the
data model of Git than our particular implementation of it.  jgit, a
Java implementation of Git, does not care about the gibberish
in the "--BEGIN PGP..." block the same way we don't care.