From: Junio C Hamano Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2018 00:29:57 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH] Do not fail test if '.' is part of $PATH Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20181201193822.GA28918@sigill.intra.peff.net> Jeff King writes: > Since the test is ultimately checking "can we run should-not-run from > the current directory", might it be simpler to actually try that as the > precondition? I.e., something like: > ... A nice egg of columbus. It also would save us from mischievous users who have should-not-run somewhere no the $PATH that outputs the string we expect (no, I do not think it is a common thing to do; I am just saying that the solution covers such an extremely stupid case without special casing).