From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 22:31:14 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] tests: avoid variations of the `master` branch name
Message-ID: <xmqq4knqep8t.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com>
In-Reply-To: <8f59e19b9562f2673c4fab5509ad8e8e2d48c19c.1600725687.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>

"Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
writes:

> diff --git a/t/t3427-rebase-subtree.sh b/t/t3427-rebase-subtree.sh
> index 79e43a370b..ba27e9d603 100755
> --- a/t/t3427-rebase-subtree.sh
> +++ b/t/t3427-rebase-subtree.sh
> @@ -15,12 +15,12 @@ commit_message() {
>  # this test script tries to document them.  First, the following commit history
>  # is generated (the onelines are shown, time flows from left to right):
>  #
> -# master1 - master2 - master3
> +# main1 - main2 - main3

The improvement between v1 and v2 made to t3200 (the previous step)
would equally apply here, no?  IOW, master1 didn't have to have a
name derived from master but could just have been called topic-1.
So replacing master[0-9] with topoic[0-9] may be more appropriate
here.