From: Junio C Hamano Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2021 00:38:13 GMT Subject: Re: git revert --continue --no-verify Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Taylor Blau writes: > On Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 04:33:09PM -0500, Cameron Steffen wrote: >> Perhaps the issue then is that the pre-commit hook should not run for >> `git revert --continue`? It does not run for `git revert`. > > This does look like an oversight to me, but you'll have to bear with me > since I am relatively unfamiliar with the sequencer code. > > Ultimately `git revert` calls do_pick_commit() which either calls > do_commit() or run_git_commit(). A couple of curiosities there: > > - do_commit() does fall back to run_git_commit() if it has the > VERIFY_MSG bit set in `flags`. > - run_git_commit() passes `-n` only when VERIFY_MSG *isn't* set, so > the VERIFY_MSG bit does imply that the pre-commit hook would be run > there. > - when do_pick_commit() does have to fall back to run_git_commit(), it > sets the VERIFY_MSG bit in flags. > > But we never end up calling run_git_commit() (except in the case of > errors) because do_pick_commit() special-cases `command == TODO_REVERT` > (which is the case for `git revert`) and calls `do_commit()`. > > But it gets weirder: do_commit() calls run_git_commit() itself, but > before the caller in do_pick_commit() has had a chance to add VERIFY_MSG > to the flags. > > So I suspect that this is an oversight, but perhaps somebody more > familiar with this code could confirm my thinking. IIRC, the "--continue" option that creates a commit came much later for lazy folks; the norm was to conclude your conflict resolution with "git commit" so that the HEAD and the index and the working tree matches before running "--continue". Wouldn't that work in this case? That is $ git A..B ... ... stops with conflict $ edit $ git add ... $ git commit --no-verify $ git --continue