From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2022 16:04:48 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] git-prompt: make colourization consistent
Message-ID: <xmqq4k0w1mu7.fsf@gitster.g>
In-Reply-To: <466ec54a-825b-c3e6-e9f2-a7007af71b6d@gmail.com>

Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com> writes:

> On 6/5/22 02:26, Joakim Petersen wrote:
>> If the user is in a sparse checkout, the sparsity state indicator
>> follows a similar pattern to the short upstream state indicator.
>> However, clearing colour of the colourized indicators changes how the
>> sparsity state indicator is colourized , as it currently inherits (and
>> before the change referenced also inherited) the colour of the last
>> short state indicator before it. Reading the commit message of the
>> change that introduced the sparsity state indicator, afda36dbf3b
>> (git-prompt: include sparsity state as well, 2020-06-21), it appears
>> this colourization also was unintended, so clearing the colour for said
>> indicator further increases consistency.
>> 
>
> colourization? I have never heared that. Did you mean "colorization" (en-US)
> or "colourisation" (en-UK)? I assumed the former.

;-)  

Either way, that word is a mouthful.  Using verb "to color" and
"coloring" might be easier to read, perhaps?