From: Junio C Hamano Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 03:29:51 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/16] refs: add methods for the ref iterators Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20160105011711.GA31667@sigill.intra.peff.net> Jeff King writes: > As much as it would be nice to clean this up before moving to multiple > backends, though, I don't think we should make it a pre-requisite. This > is a difficult topic as it is, and I'd rather see us make incremental > improvement (backends, then hopefully more flexible mixing of backends) > than get bogged down and get neither. Oh, yes, if I sounded like this needs to be cleaned up before it can go in, that wasn't what I meant. After all, the single in-core index support was adequate for our use even before the multiple in-core index support was introduced, and we still use the API to access the single default instance in most of the codepaths. I'd expect that the ref API will evolve in the same way.