From: Junio C Hamano Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2017 18:34:21 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH] git-bisect.txt: add missing word Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20170401064056.56969-1-quentin.pradet@gmail.com> Quentin Pradet writes: > Signed-off-by: Quentin Pradet > --- > Documentation/git-bisect.txt | 6 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) The updated text is more grammatically correct. It would have been better if you avoided wrapping the lines unnecessarily, though. Thanks. > diff --git a/Documentation/git-bisect.txt b/Documentation/git-bisect.txt > index bdd915a66..90148bb07 100644 > --- a/Documentation/git-bisect.txt > +++ b/Documentation/git-bisect.txt > @@ -137,9 +137,9 @@ respectively, in place of "good" and "bad". (But note that you cannot > mix "good" and "bad" with "old" and "new" in a single session.) > > In this more general usage, you provide `git bisect` with a "new" > -commit has some property and an "old" commit that doesn't have that > -property. Each time `git bisect` checks out a commit, you test if that > -commit has the property. If it does, mark the commit as "new"; > +commit that has some property and an "old" commit that doesn't have > +that property. Each time `git bisect` checks out a commit, you test if > +that commit has the property. If it does, mark the commit as "new"; > otherwise, mark it as "old". When the bisection is done, `git bisect` > will report which commit introduced the property.