From: Junio C Hamano Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2017 15:08:32 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] branch: forbid refs/heads/HEAD Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <0f8166ab-7955-aa78-7d32-0ec80944f007@gmail.com> Kaartic Sivaraam writes: > I should have been a little more clear with the numbering, sorry. The > correct prefix should have been as follows, > > * [PATCH v2 1/2] --> [PATCH v2 3/3] > > * [PATCH v2 1/2] --> [PATCH v2 4/3] > > Sorry for the inconvenience. I assume that the second one above actually talks about what was sent as "v2 2/2" (not "v2 1/2") being "4/3"? Are these two patches follow-up fixes (replacement of 3/3 plus an extra patch) to jc/branch-name-sanity topic? Thanks for working on these.