From: Junio C Hamano Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2019 09:51:11 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] commit-graph: use start_delayed_progress() Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20191107064356.GH6431@sigill.intra.peff.net> Jeff King writes: > I think any no/auto/always here is tricky, because it already has a > meaning: to use or disregard isatty(2). And overriding that might be > independent of the "type". Yes, your "let the users optionally give the delay" in the other subthread makes a lot more sense. Thanks.