From: Junio C Hamano Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2022 20:31:58 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 06/11] diagnose.c: add option to configure archive contents Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <710b67e5776363d199ed5043d019386819d44e7e.1660335019.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> "Victoria Dye via GitGitGadget" writes: > -int create_diagnostics_archive(struct strbuf *zip_path) > +int create_diagnostics_archive(struct strbuf *zip_path, enum diagnose_mode mode) > { > struct strvec archiver_args = STRVEC_INIT; > char **argv_copy = NULL; > int stdout_fd = -1, archiver_fd = -1; > struct strbuf buf = STRBUF_INIT; > - int res; > + int res, i; > + struct archive_dir archive_dirs[] = { > + { ".git", 0 }, > + { ".git/hooks", 0 }, > + { ".git/info", 0 }, > + { ".git/logs", 1 }, > + { ".git/objects/info", 0 } > + }; > + > + if (mode == DIAGNOSE_NONE) { > + res = 0; > + goto diagnose_cleanup; > + } > > stdout_fd = dup(STDOUT_FILENO); > if (stdout_fd < 0) { > @@ -177,12 +194,18 @@ int create_diagnostics_archive(struct strbuf *zip_path) > loose_objs_stats(&buf, ".git/objects"); > strvec_push(&archiver_args, buf.buf); > > - if ((res = add_directory_to_archiver(&archiver_args, ".git", 0)) || > - (res = add_directory_to_archiver(&archiver_args, ".git/hooks", 0)) || > - (res = add_directory_to_archiver(&archiver_args, ".git/info", 0)) || > - (res = add_directory_to_archiver(&archiver_args, ".git/logs", 1)) || > - (res = add_directory_to_archiver(&archiver_args, ".git/objects/info", 0))) > - goto diagnose_cleanup; > + /* Only include this if explicitly requested */ > + if (mode == DIAGNOSE_ALL) { > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(archive_dirs); i++) { > + if (add_directory_to_archiver(&archiver_args, > + archive_dirs[i].path, > + archive_dirs[i].recursive)) { > + res = error_errno(_("could not add directory '%s' to archiver"), > + archive_dirs[i].path); > + goto diagnose_cleanup; > + } > + } > + } Even without the "only include under DIAGNOSE_ALL" support added by this step, the table-driven organization is much nicer. The earlier "move to common" step aimed to be as close as pure move, so this step is our first opportunity to make this clean-up, so I do not mind too much about this step doing two unrelated things (one is to clean-up the if (A||B||C) into a loop over A, B and C, the other is to introduce the diagnose_mode) at once. Thanks.