From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 20:15:18 GMT
Subject: Re: How to trim the fat on my log graphs
Message-ID: <xmqq1twnztt4.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHd499Cw8=FMctRA49MUi+vP2gvMyXH9WgcfCKK_MrKDEOfvjw@mail.gmail.com>

Robert Dailey <rcdailey.lists@gmail.com> writes:

> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 12:30 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
>> Robert Dailey <rcdailey.lists@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>> [Administrivia: because people read from top to bottom / why is it
>> bad to top-post? / please do not top-post.]
>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 4:37 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
>>>> Robert Dailey <rcdailey.lists@gmail.com> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> git log log --graph --abbrev-commit --decorate --date=relative
>>>>> --format=format:'%C(bold blue)%h%C(reset)%x09%C(bold
>>>>> green)(%ar)%C(reset)%C(bold yellow)%d%C(reset) %C(dim
>>>>> white)%an%C(reset) - %C(white)%s%C(reset)' --branches --remotes
>>>>> ...
> ... I also tried removing it to test
> but i saw no difference; tag names are still visible.

I do not use these eye-candies myself (they are too distracting for
me), but doesn't "%d" in the format string mean "decorate"?