From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2015 18:44:12 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] refs backend preamble
Message-ID: <xmqq1tgxf0ub.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
In-Reply-To: <1435379036-30894-1-git-send-email-dturner@twopensource.com>

David Turner <dturner@twopensource.com> writes:

> This version addresses Junio's comments on v3.

The end result makes more sense than the previous one, but did you
screw up when rewriting and/or squashing patches around the new 4/6?

I think that one has two separate changes mixed into one and does a
lot more than "this is just for clarity".  I think they should stay
separate, as the other changes are more impactful and deserve their
own justification and explanation.

Thanks.