From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2015 16:15:34 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] add test to demonstrate that shallow recursive clones fail
Message-ID: <xmqq1tb2tck9.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAGZ79kbtOEMk2woY5rovvC4xduiQRsKp+BXVt=5h9d76tpLWSA@mail.gmail.com>

Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> writes:

> Did you have any reason to pick . specifically or are we welcome to bikeshed
> why a colon might be better? (or ":", "?", "[", "\", "^", "~", SP, or TAB)
>
> We could use [id]c78f7b5ed9dc1c6edc8db06ac65860151d54fd07
> or [const]c78f7b5ed9dc1c6edc8db06ac65860151d54fd07 ?

As to the bikeshedding, I kind of like the above.

    [object:c78f7b5ed9dc1c6edc8db06ac65860151d54fd07]

would be a more natural way to use the pairwise magic characters
like [], I suspect.

Thanks.