From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2016 18:38:13 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fetch-pack: fix unadvertised requests validation
Message-ID: <xmqq1t7ygfsa.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
In-Reply-To: <xmqq60xagg1w.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>

Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:

> Nah, I think you just misspelt hashcpy() as hashcmp().  The original
> wanted to get the binary representation of the hex in old_sha1 when
> it continued, and you wanted to delay the touching of old_sha1 until
> we make sure that the input is valid 40-hex.

That much was correct, but...

> , so something like this
> is what Gabriel wants to do (which I agree with), isn't it?

... definitely not that X-<.  The "do this or fail || do that or
fail || ..." chain in the if condition part confused me.

I think Gabriel's patch is exactly what we want.

Sorry for starting a review before caffeine ;-)