From: Junio C Hamano Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 04:24:55 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] doc: cleaning up instances of \-- Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Martin Ă…gren writes: > This is a patch series to convert \-- to -- in our documentation. The > first patch is a reiteration of 1c262bb7b2 (doc: convert \--option to > --option, 2015-05-13) to fix some instances that have appeared since. > The other three patches deal with standalone "\--" which we can't > always turn into "--" since it can be rendered as an em dash. All looked sensible. As you mentioned in [2/4], "\--::" that is part of an enumulation appear in documentation for about a dozen commands after the series, but I do not think we can avoid it. One thing that makes me wonder related to these patches is if a newer AsciiDoc we assume lets us do without {litdd} macro. This series and our earlier effort like 1c262bb7 ("doc: convert \--option to --option", 2015-05-13) mentions that "\--word" is less pleasant on the eyes than "--word", but the ugliness "two{litdd}words" has over "two--words" is far worse than that, so... Thanks, will queue.