From: Junio C Hamano Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2026 19:39:00 GMT Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Jan 2026, #09) Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Taylor Blau writes: > On Tue, Jan 27, 2026 at 09:42:00AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> * ps/odb-for-each-object (2026-01-26) 16 commits >> - odb: drop unused `for_each_{loose,packed}_object()` functions >> - reachable: convert to use `odb_for_each_object()` >> - builtin/pack-objects: use `packfile_store_for_each_object()` >> - odb: introduce mtime fields for object info requests >> - treewide: drop uses of `for_each_{loose,packed}_object()` >> - treewide: enumerate promisor objects via `odb_for_each_object()` >> - builtin/fsck: refactor to use `odb_for_each_object()` >> - odb: introduce `odb_for_each_object()` >> - packfile: introduce function to iterate through objects >> - packfile: extract function to iterate through objects of a store >> - object-file: introduce function to iterate through objects >> - object-file: extract function to read object info from path >> - odb: fix flags parameter to be unsigned >> - odb: rename `FOR_EACH_OBJECT_*` flags >> - Merge branch 'ps/packfile-store-in-odb-source' into ps/odb-for-each-object >> - Merge branch 'ps/read-object-info-improvements' into ps/odb-for-each-object >> >> Revamp object enumeration API around odb. >> >> Will merge to 'next'? >> source: <20260126-pks-odb-for-each-object-v4-0-5a64a038c791@pks.im> > > I have some lingering questions about the mtime-related changes. I am > not opposed to the series in general, but I think some more time to > continue the discussion in that thread would be beneficial before > starting to merge it down. Has any further discussions took place outside the original thread https://lore.kernel.org/git/20260126-pks-odb-for-each-object-v4-0-5a64a038c791@pks.im/ or are we pretty much done with this iteration and polish incrementally if necessary? Thanks.