From: Ramkumar Ramachandra Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2010 04:54:34 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH v9] Documentation/remote-helpers: Add invocation section Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <7vzl1eamss.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Hi, On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 4:19 AM, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Thank you for this.  FWIW I find it useful when discussing a piece of > code or documentation to bounce back and forth multiple versions of > small fragments.  Then once the discussion has settled down, it can be > useful to see the big picture again, with the new changes > incorporated. Got it. In future, I'll post diffs for smaller changes hopefully in the same email thread, and complete patches for larger changes in a separate email thread. I've been quite haphazard in the past. > If you want to make sure the latest version of a patch is always > available, that is a noble goal, too, but I think a frequently- > rebased public branch for your patch series is a better way to achieve > that. Ah, I already do that, but my branch is based on `pu`. What should I do? http://github.com/artagnon/git On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 4:32 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > At least it would be helpful for me if people based their follow-up > patches on top of their own topics. Can I see the topic branch corresponding to my patches? If this is possible, I can avoid the more painful procedure of extracting it from the latest pu using git-resurrect.sh. -- Ram