From: Matthieu Moy <matthieu.moy@grenoble-inp.fr>
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 07:36:51 GMT
Subject: Re: [PUB]What's cooking in git.git (Aug 2015, #05; Fri, 28)
Message-ID: <vpqzj17hpt8.fsf@anie.imag.fr>
In-Reply-To: <xmqq4mjj15lm.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>

Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:

> * ad/bisect-terms (2015-08-03) 4 commits
>  - bisect: allow setting any user-specified in 'git bisect start'
>  - bisect: add 'git bisect terms' to view the current terms
>  - bisect: add the terms old/new
>  - bisect: sanity check on terms
>
>  The use of 'good/bad' in "git bisect" made it confusing to use when
>  hunting for a state change that is not a regression (e.g. bugfix).
>  The command learned 'old/new' and then allows the end user to
>  say e.g. "bisect start --term-old=fast --term=new=slow" to find a
>  performance regression.
>
>  Michael's idea to make 'good/bad' more intelligent does have
>  certain attractiveness ($gname/272867), and makes some of the work
>  on this topic a moot point.
>
>  Will hold.

This topic has been there for a while and unless I missed a discussion,
nothing happened. While I agree that Michael's idea is good and makes
this series less useful, I think this topic also makes sense.

I'd be in favor of merging it.

-- 
Matthieu Moy
http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/