From: Matthieu Moy <matthieu.moy@grenoble-inp.fr>
Date: Sat, 04 May 2013 21:11:44 GMT
Subject: Re: Another use of "@"?
Message-ID: <vpqtxmi8n73.fsf@grenoble-inp.fr>
In-Reply-To: <CALkWK0=qdGcbQDz2VomhOcy7AybXj5jkxzS53jFGyjdZ9+6juQ@mail.gmail.com>

Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com> writes:

> On Matthieu's note, I have a comment: symbolic refs are an absolute
> dead end.  We didn't think of it from the start, and it's too late
> now.  Do NOT go there: from my investigation, I believe that hooking
> up everything to the revision parser is the way forward.

My comment was not about the solution, but about the problem (which
seemed to have been misunderstood). The question seems to be "get the
reference with the same names as what HEAD points to, but on remote A",
and the "points to" part is about symbolic references.

-- 
Matthieu Moy
http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/