From: Matthieu Moy <matthieu.moy@grenoble-inp.fr>
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 07:00:16 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] git-checkout.txt: Document "git checkout <pathspec>" better
Message-ID: <vpqioalfqm7.fsf@anie.imag.fr>
In-Reply-To: <xmqqpp4u6swo.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>

Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:

> I think "restore" also by definition has to go back to _some_
> existing version, not a future yet-to-be-created one, so "restore to
> some previous state" is superfluous;

That's why I found "restore recorded state" not too bad.

> "restore working tree files"

Not a native, but to me "restore file" sounds like "the file is damaged,
it needs to be restored/repaired".

In any case,

  Switch branches or restore working tree files

is an improvement over the existing to me, so my bikeshedding should not
be used to reject this proposal.

-- 
Matthieu Moy
http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/