From: Matthieu Moy Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 12:42:36 GMT Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] push: start warning upcoming default change for push.default Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <7vy5r0iwdb.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Junio C Hamano writes: > Matthieu Moy writes: > >> I'd count "upstream is not set" as "current and upstream agree on >> 'current'". IOW, use "current", but error out if there's a configured >> upstream that is different. > > And if there is no configured upstream, should it error out, or should it > just push the current one to its own name? I meant just push the current one to its own name. -- Matthieu Moy http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/