From: Matthieu Moy <matthieu.moy@grenoble-inp.fr>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 08:09:35 GMT
Subject: Re: push.default: current vs upstream
Message-ID: <vpqhawp2wxs.fsf@bauges.imag.fr>
In-Reply-To: <20120412075535.GC31122@sigill.intra.peff.net>

Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:

> I think it is as simple as applying the usual upstream rules, then
> checking the remote name against the local name. Like this:

This fails if no upstream is configured. I think applying "current"
instead of failing in this case makes perfect sense (i.e. "simple"
should fail only if there is an upstream configured, and it has a
different name).

-- 
Matthieu Moy
http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/