From: Matthieu Moy <matthieu.moy@grenoble-inp.fr>
Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2011 19:29:11 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] unpack-trees.c: check return value of lstat()
Message-ID: <vpqfwr0hwu0.fsf@bauges.imag.fr>
In-Reply-To: <201103062013.52793.tboegi@web.de>

Torsten Bögershausen <tboegi@web.de> writes:

> +		if (!lstat(path, &st))
> +			return check_ok_to_remove(path, len, DT_UNKNOWN, NULL, &st,
> +			                          error_type, o);
>  	} else if (!lstat(ce->name, &st))

What happens if lstat returns a non-0 value?

Anyway, this seems to have been fixed by a93e53018 (Wed Jan 12 20:28:09
2011, unpack-trees: handle lstat failure for existing file) already.

-- 
Matthieu Moy
http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/