From: Matthieu Moy Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 07:04:39 GMT Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH v2 2/3] submodule: introduce --[no-]display-comment-char Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <521E6674.1010201@web.de> Jens Lehmann writes: > But I'm not terribly happy about having the --for-status option in the > submodule script in the first place, as I believe it should rather be > handled by wt-status.c itself (reading the output of submodule summary > using the start_command()/finish_command() combo instead of the simple > run_command() currently used and prepending the comment char by using > status_printf() & friends for each line). I went the --for-status way because it's easier to do this in shell than in C. But I'm close to be convinced that implementing this on the wt-status.c side is better. I'll try a re-roll doing this when I get time. -- Matthieu Moy http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/