From: Scott Chacon Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2010 13:53:13 GMT Subject: [RFC PATCH 1/4] Document the HTTP transport protocol Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Hey, On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 11:09 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Scott Chacon writes: > >> On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 10:22 PM, Shawn O. Pearce wrote: >>> Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce >>> --- >>>  Documentation/technical/http-protocol.txt |  542 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>  1 files changed, 542 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >>>  create mode 100644 Documentation/technical/http-protocol.txt >> >> I just spent a while looking for this in my email archive - why was >> this document not added to the technical/ dir?  Can we put it there? > > Perhaps because it was marked as RFC and not much discussion went on? > Sorry, but I cannot keep mental bandwidth to remember the threads from 6 > months ago while doing this as a part-time non-job ;-) > I understand, it wasn't meant as a criticism, I was just curious why this file was never included.  That the series was marked as RFC makes sense.  Could I request that this one patch be included?  Or if Shawn has a more recent one?  I have found and extracted it and have it in a topic branch locally, but if someone else wanted to reference it to implement the HTTP stuff it would probably be really helpful to at least have something in the main tree. Thanks, Scott