From: Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 03 May 2010 17:58:05 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] git over TLS (gits://) support
Message-ID: <s2h32541b131005031058o4d2df47ei7fcd5205db89eeb7@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <j2tbe6fef0d1005030557l1f746349zfce18213add19efe@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 8:57 AM, Tay Ray Chuan <rctay89@gmail.com> wrote:
> From the discussion, Avery (Cc'ed) had some strong objections; the
> point that I remembered the most clearly was "why not just use SSH".
> There didn't seem to be any headway.
>
> I hope that we can continue where we left off and resolve the various
> objections without too much duplication of shot-down arguments.

After more consideration, I withdraw my objection since the fact that
I don't need it, nor does anybody I know need it, isn't actually a
good argument against including it.  I assume the Powers That Be would
still like to see some people who *do* need it before including such a
huge chunk of code.

Have fun,

Avery