From: Matthias Urlichs <smurf@smurf.noris.de>
Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2006 15:19:03 GMT
Subject: git-ls-files --unmerged implies --stages: ?
Message-ID: <pan.2006.03.09.15.19.03.286472@smurf.noris.de>

Hi,

I wonder why git-ls-files --unmerged implies --stages. One nice use case
for this command is to edit all the conflicting files after a failed
merge, i.e.

$ vi $(git-ls-files --unmerged)

except I need a pipe to throw out all the cruft in there.

Does anybody depend on that implication, or do I need to add a "no-stages"
option, or am I blind and there's a better way to do this?

-- 
Matthias Urlichs