From: Linus Arver <linusa@google.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2023 05:40:08 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/9] Trailer readability cleanups
Message-ID: <owlyttrhsdaf.fsf@fine.c.googlers.com>
In-Reply-To: <xmqqo7htww7k.fsf@gitster.g>

Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:

> Linus Arver <linusa@google.com> writes:
>
>>> I could revert and discard [4-6/6] of the previous iteration out of
>>> 'next' and have only the first three (which I thought have been
>>> adequately reviewed without remaining issues) graduate to 'master',
>>> if it makes it easier to fix this update on top, but I'd rather not
>>> to encourage people to form a habit of reverting changes out of
>>> 'next'.
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>
>> I totally agree that reverting changes out of next is undesirable. I
>> will do a reroll on top of 'next' with only those incremental (new)
>> patches.
>
> OK, so the first 3 patches are now in 'master', and the remainder of
> the previous series have been discarded.
>
> Thanks.

Oh, that simplifies things. I will re-roll on top of 'master' as the
starting point for the other remaining patches instead of using 'next'
as I suggested earlier.