From: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2020 18:23:58 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/8] t4124: fix test for non-compliant diff(1)
Message-ID: <nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.2003251923340.46@tvgsbejvaqbjf.bet>
In-Reply-To: <xmqqtv2dz5mf.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com>

Hi Junio,

On Tue, 24 Mar 2020, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:
>
> > With this explanation, I totally agree that your patch is better than
> > mine.
>
> Meaning that we'd have a fallback checker that understands "diff -u"
> output, because the presense of "diff -u" cannot be relied upon and
> we'd need to keep the original that understands "diff -c" anyway?
>
> If that is what you meant, I am 100% fine with that.

Yes, that's what I meant. Thanks for clearing this up!

Ciao,
Dscho