From: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2019 15:04:04 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/11] hashmap_entry: detect improper initialization
Message-ID: <nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.1908281703191.46@tvgsbejvaqbjf.bet>
In-Reply-To: <xmqqa7bu2r01.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>

Hi Junio,

On Tue, 27 Aug 2019, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> My plan is to have ew/hashmap topic for a few days while ejecting
> the js/add-i topic which semantically conflicts with the changed way
> hashmaps ought to be used temporarily, and when I have enough time
> and concentration, try to see if I can come up with a good semantic
> conflict resolution that I can keep reusing (aka refs/merge-fix/).
> If it happens, we'll see both topics, and if it doesn't, I'll then
> drop ew/hashmap and queue js/add-i and rinse and repeat from there
> ;-)

FWIW I crafted my latest iteration such that you would only need to do
the `hash` => `_hash` rename in one line to merge `js/builtin-add-i`.

Ciao,
Dscho