From: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2018 08:15:25 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/18] Add a new builtin: branch-diff
Message-ID: <nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.1806011013340.82@tvgsbejvaqbjf.bet>
In-Reply-To: <CAA8fPEkNjy+ETz4Mx+C2kUfLjLzR9uuOmO3GfN48ZH1SwyfE1A@mail.gmail.com>

Hi team,

especially Stefan: your thorough investigation about a better name than
range-diff gives me confidence that my decision to retract my objection
against has merit: it seems to be by far the one name that everybody but
me agrees on. And I can adapt easily.

On Sat, 26 May 2018, Øyvind Rønningstad wrote:

> Just want to throw my support in for range-diff since ranges is what you
> pass to the command.

`range-diff` it is.

Ciao,
Dscho