From: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2008 21:44:54 GMT
Subject: Re: Git Branding Overview, Re: Git.or.cz Experimental Design
Message-ID: <m3od4sw7qj.fsf@localhost.localdomain>
In-Reply-To: <20080718103918.GO10151@machine.or.cz>

Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz> writes:

>   If you or anyone is shooting for a re-design, I would suggest to
> somehow relate to the current "Git brandings" in use:
> 
> 	http://git.or.cz/git-logo.png
> 	http://henrik.nyh.se/uploads/git-logo.png
> 
>   If you think you have a cooler logo, that's fine too, but then it's
> again better to present it explicitly, I believe. The latter is used
> especially within mSysGit, the former is used more widely - at the
> current homepage, as Gitweb logo, and in various modifications like
> 
> 	http://git.nyh.se/git-favicon.png
> 	http://members.cox.net/junkio/git.png
> 	http://unfuddle.com/images/screens/source.big.jpg
> 		(top left ;)

By the way, if you find some git logo, please add it to git wiki:

  http://git.or.cz/gitwiki/GitRelatedLogos

I think beside the one from Unfuddle all of them are present on
this page.


P.S. Do anybody remember how we came about current (old) git logo?

P.P.S. Petr, do you know what's the matter with Git Wiki? It looks
like moin4wiki (Wikipeda-like syntax) parser is installed halfway in.

-- 
Jakub Narebski
Poland
ShadeHawk on #git