From: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2010 05:41:54 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] Documentation/remote-helpers: Rewrite description
Message-ID: <m2of3271551004172241s423ba152re466b18284d73158@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <w2jbe6fef0d1004172223kd0d5de2hccf67badf817bd97@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

> barring any comment from Junio, I think a fixup is probably more
> onerous than a resend with the fixup squashed in; that is, assuming
> the old iteration is already git-am'ed in, and the fixup applies onto
> a new iteration.

I'll clarify. The fixup applies to `d8e255cb385365` in `pu`. The
thread begins with a patch generated from this commit: the commit is
stalled in `pu` due to lack of acks.

-- Ram