From: Seth Falcon <sethfalcon@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 15:15:49 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Making "git commit" to mean "git commit -a".
Message-ID: <m2odqpm0d6.fsf@ziti.fhcrc.org>
In-Reply-To: <ekmlf4$ask$3@sea.gmane.org>

Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> writes:

> Salikh Zakirov wrote:
>
>> Someone said, that default '-a' does not go well with 'git-commit --amend',
>> and I second that. It was somewhat suprising to see that 'git commit --amend'
>> is going to include all of the dirty state into the commit,
>> and since there is no easy way to abort a --amend commit (because the comment
>> buffer wasn't empty, and :q! does not work as it would on the regular commit),
>> I had to untwine the changes manually.
>
> By the way, I think that git-commit should also watch the return code
> from the editor, so you can ^C it to abort git-commit --amend.

For those using emacsclient, I don't think ^C will work.  Is there
another way to undu an ammend commit?  If not, is there any sense in