From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 19:58:20 GMT
Subject: Re: Failure to extra stable@vger.kernel.org addresses
Message-ID: <m2lidw11yb.fsf@igel.home>
In-Reply-To: <20121120115942.GA6132@shrek.podlesie.net>

Krzysztof Mazur <krzysiek@podlesie.net> writes:

> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 11:28:39AM +0100, Felipe Contreras wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 8:56 AM, Krzysztof Mazur <krzysiek@podlesie.net> wrote:
>> 
>> > --- a/git-send-email.perl
>> > +++ b/git-send-email.perl
>> > @@ -925,8 +925,11 @@ sub quote_subject {
>> >  sub sanitize_address {
>> >         my ($recipient) = @_;
>> >
>> > +       my $local_part_regexp = qr/[^<>"\s@]+/;
>> > +       my $domain_regexp = qr/[^.<>"\s@]+(?:\.[^.<>"\s@]+)+/;
>> > +
>> >         # remove garbage after email address
>> > -       $recipient =~ s/(.*>).*$/$1/;
>> > +       $recipient =~ s/^(.*?<$local_part_regexp\@$domain_regexp>).*/$1/;
>> 
>> I don't think all that extra complexity is warranted, to me
>> s/(.*?>)(.*)$/$1/ is just fine.
>> 
>
> Yeah, it's a little bit too complex, but "s/(.*?>)(.*)$/$1/"

How about "s/(.*?<[^>]*>).*$/$1/"?  That will still fail on "<foo@bar>"
<foo@bar>, but you'll need a full rfc822 parser to handle the general
case anyway.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."