From: Andreas Schwab Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 19:30:47 GMT Subject: Re: [BUG] Possible bug in `remote set-url --add --push` Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <7v622xyvnd.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Junio C Hamano writes: > I actually think my earlier "it shouldn't be the same (push)" is not > needed and probably is actively wrong. Just like you can tell > between > > (only one .url) (both .url and .pushurl) > > origin there (fetch/push) origin there (fetch) > origin there (push) What should happen when you have a .pushinsteadof configured that modifies .url for pushing? Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."