From: Ed Avis <eda@waniasset.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 13:43:07 GMT
Subject: Re: Feature: git stash pop --always-drop
Message-ID: <loom.20150810T153939-856@post.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <20150810133220.GA3559@sigill.intra.peff.net>

Jeff King <peff <at> peff.net> writes:

>>An alternative would be for git stash to always print the name of the stash
>>it is applying.

>  Applying refs/stash@{0} (31cb86c3d700d241e315d989f460e3e83f84fa19)

Yes, that's the one.

>Or maybe it would be useful to actually show the stash subject,

That could be nice to see, but is not a substitute for the SHA.

If the stash pop failed because of conflicts then it could even print

    To drop this stash manually, run 'git stash drop abcde...'

Another feature I would like to see is a kind of atomic stash apply, where
either the whole change can be applied to the working tree without conflicts,
or nothing happens.

-- 
Ed Avis <eda@waniasset.com>