From: Vadim Zeitlin Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2013 00:38:37 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH] Avoid false positives in label detection in cpp diff hunk header regex. Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <514CE53F.3080308@kdbg.org> Johannes Sixt kdbg.org> writes: > > I also wonder if > > > > label : > > > > should also be caught, or is it too weird format to be worth > > supporting? > > It's easy to support, by inserting another [ \t] before the first colon. > So, why not? This is really nitpicking, but if we do it, then it should be "[ \t]*". And the "*" after the label should actually be a "+". So the full line becomes "!^[ \t]*[A-Za-z_][A-Za-z_0-9]+[ \t]*:([^:]|$)\n" But then I've never actually seen git putting labels incorrectly into the hunk headers while I did see the problem this patch tries to fix, with wrong method appearing in the header because the correct one was skipped due to this ignore regex, quite a few times in the past. Regards, VZ